the-peony-pavilion:

That awkward moment when crazed people get offended because I’m uncomfortable with some chick who’s hardly( I mean cmon) in the book having a bunch of freaky sexual lines toward Jon Snow. Cmon, she’s not even likeable. And I really don’t see someone trying to force sex onto someone else as “character development,” it’s HBO trying to get ratings so horny 13 year old boys can get off to Game of Thrones. I read the books so yes I am going to want them to stick to a plot that is at least somewhat relevant to the books and not a complete waste of time and money. And yes I do complain about the Robb scenes. Like this season I seriously do not know what they are doing. Leave me to my opinions, as we are all entitled to them. Now hush bb~

No.

madridistagooner:

Reread the book yesterday so it seems fitting

God, it’s all coming back to me why I constantly switch between loving and hating Catelyn. I mean, yeah she’s all fearsome and a force to be reckoned with and all, and I do love that about her, but I hate that she’s so horrible to Jon.

Seriously Cat, tone down the bitch

No.

exarkun:

Since the season 2 debut, I’ve seen a lot of rage online about how HBO has changed the politically savy, strong, cunning woman Catelyn into a generic mother who wants to get back to her children. Now, this rage is all well and good, but where in the seven hells is anybody getting the idea that Catelyn is politically savy, or smart? At best, she parrots what Robbs other lords are already telling him. Let’s have a rundown of what she actually does. (Spoilers ahead)

1. She forces Ned to go to Kings Landing, where he is killed

2. She abducts a member of one of the most powerful houses of Westeros with only the smallest shred of evidence, which then ignites a war.

3. She then let’s her psychotic sister allow the only hostage House Stark has to escape.

4. She fails to bring either of the Baratheon Brothers to Robbs cause.

5. She frees Robbs most valuable captive, one of the most dangerous Lannister Commanders and a Knight of the Kingsguard, in order to get her daughters back, neither of whom would actually contribute to Robbs cause.

6. She trusts the word of a known oathbreaker, and his brother (Whom she previously captured and accused of attempted murder)

7. Her folly costs Robb the entire strength of Karhold, as well as inspiring doubt within his other lords. This action also could have meant blood between the Bolton and Karstark men at Harrenhal.

Now, let’s look at the positive things she’s done…

1. She did warn Robb against sending Theon, only because she had been around during Lord Balons last rebellion. She had no real reason to mistrust Theon, however, aside from the fact that he wasn’t her son. The same reason she has for despising Jon.

2. She told Robb that he must win back the North, though the decision can hardly be credited to her. Nearly every one of Robbs bannermen was saying the same thing.

If anyone thinks I’ve missed something great that she’s done, by all means, let me know. The best argument I’ve seen seems to be that she suggested treating with Renly and Stannis. To me, that’s like saying someone who suggests making peace in the middle-east is no different from someone who achieves peace in the middle-east.

No.

fringeanatomy:

I NEVER liked Ygritte. She was such an annoying slutty savage. 

All i read was how all she wanted was to have sex with Jon and that was pretty much her purpose in all the chapters. And she would never be loyal to him. NEVER. Also, the part where she cuts the throat of an old man for building a fire like the savage that SHE was and shooting Jon in the leg so he couldn’t run away knowing that if he stayed he would be killed. I’m glad she died because if i would read her saying “You know nothing Jon Snow” one more time i would find a way to kill her myself. 

Her whole purpose in the 3rd book was to make Jon lose his virginity. That was the whole purpose of her character and that’s why she was killed after that, no more purpose to her in the story besides that. 

Also the 3rd book made me ashamed of Jon for the first time. I always saw Jon so honorable and reading scenes where they’re having sex in the floor with all those people around without any decency or morals… even other wildlings mocked them saying to have to spill cold water on them, “like dogs in the street” Jon said himself.  Even him was ashamed.

And finally is pretty ridiculous to think that they were *really* in love. They spent a few months together, Jon always had a secret agenda, it was always based in lies and betray. Jon cared for her, I’m sure, he was a virgin and the entire time he spent with her was filled with torrid sex. I’m sure he enjoyed that, but if you take that out of the chapters, the remaining 5% of time they spent together, actually talking was just to make so clear how different they were.

Stop making Ygritte the love of his life, she was just the only woman in his life. He would never had given a second look at her if they weren’t on that situation and he didn’t even liked her in the beginning. He said this himself. 

No.

slayful:

I had forgotten how much I despise Catelyn Stark. Is there a club I can join? Can we put her in the Burn Book? She’s the worst.

No.

mufb:

Is just as, if not more annoying, in the book as she was in the tv show. My god, what a stupid girl

No.

thiscaseofidentity:

I really don’t like Ygritte. There is nothing behind her relationship with Jon. Shes just a….ehem…..”classy” lady who has caused him to break his vows. I’m so ready for her to die. I cant stand her dumb “you know nothing, Jon snow” comments and her punches. The relationship is purely physical, based off a lie, and she has no soul (ginger). The worst part is, I have lost some respect for Jon through all this.

Actually the worst part is that I am this upset over a fictional storyline…..

No.

zobothehob0:

topherbrinked:

but why couldn’t holmes and watson BOTH be ladies

This would piss me off more to be honest.  Mainly, and I know this is stupid but… mainly because I HATE female/female slash shipping with like every fiber of my being.  So the whole fandom would make me want to kill them.  And I know that shouldn’t be the point… but it is.

No.

primadonnagirl:

I mean, I just don’t see why people don’t get that Gaga is just far ahead what any of her contemporaries could hope to be. Her contemporaries are still great, but they are simply not of the caliber that Gaga has shown herself to be capable of, even on their best days. She really is the only one left, at the moment, to keep pop music going forward.

Britney has chosen a life as a mother instead of fame and is just not mentally stable.

Madonna is shitting-bricks afraid of not being the pop star she once was and letting someone else take her spot that it’s hurting the quality of her music.

Christina has lost any connection with her music and has entertained the realm of reality television. 

Adele is a niche artist who got big. She’ll be replaced by yet the next singer-songwriter-adult-contemporary act of 2012/13 and never have the success she saw with Rolling In The Deep.

Katy, even with six number one singles off of one album/rerelease, can’t sell albums. She’s pop fluff. She’s easily-made, mass manufactured pop music. She’ll like the Paula Abdul of the early 2010s and will stay there forever.

Ke$ha is floating off in space and was a cute “thing” that happened despite also being a talented musician. She’ll go off and do different genres, never finding the same success she did in her early career like Cyndi Lauper.

Rihanna has not only spit on her fanbase, but ran back to her abuser. She’s obviously not well mentally and is slowly destroying her career. It’s like an even bigger shock than when we found out Milli Vanilli was a lie. Well, so was Rihanna, Bye bye, RiRi.

Gaga is simply the only one smart enough, ballsy enough, and creative enough to keep pop music forward. New girls will enter the scene and old ones will leave, but Gaga will remain for years and years to come, constantly reminding people why she is one of the most iconic figures in pop music. She’s not only the present, but the future.

No.

galefknhawthorne:

I do not hate Cersei Lannister because she is a woman who is ambitious. I hate Cersei Lannister because she is stupid with her ambition and an all-around horrible human being. I do not think she should be entitled to any sort of power, not because she is a woman, but because she is stupid. She thinks she is all intelligent and is making the right choices but she is just ruining everything, tbh. There are plenty of women in Westeros who are ambitious and would do well with power. Cersei Lannister? She is not one of them. So, no, I am not prejudice or sexist because I do not like Cersei Lannister. 

No.